Current:Home > ContactProposed protective order would infringe on Trump's free speech, his lawyers say -AssetPath
Proposed protective order would infringe on Trump's free speech, his lawyers say
View
Date:2025-04-23 06:35:34
Former President Donald Trump's legal team says that a protective order proposed by special counsel Jack Smith would infringe on Trump's right to free speech.
Trump's attorneys made the argument in their response Monday to the special counsel's motion for a protective order over the discovery evidence in the case against Trump for allegedly seeking to overturn the 2020 election.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to charges of undertaking a "criminal scheme" to overturn the results of the 2020 election by enlisting a slate of so-called "fake electors" targeting several states; using the Justice Department to conduct "sham election crime investigations"; and trying to enlist the vice president to "alter the election results" -- all in an effort to subvert democracy and remain in power.
MORE: Special counsel alerts court to Trump’s social media post
The former president has denied all wrongdoing and has dismissed the probe as politically motivated.
Monday's filing argues for narrower limits on the protective order, which Trump's attorneys say would protect sensitive materials while ensuring Trump's right to free speech.
"In a trial about First Amendment rights, the government seeks to restrict First Amendment rights," Trump's attorneys wrote in their filing. "Worse, it does so against its administration's primary political opponent, during an election season in which the administration, prominent party members, and media allies have campaigned on the indictment and proliferated its false allegations."
Smith's indictment against Trump, unsealed last week, disputes that he is being charged for exercising his First Amendment rights, instead alleging that he perpetrated three criminal conspiracies as "unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results."
Smith asked the judge for the protective order on Friday, referencing a social media post Trump made Friday afternoon in which he said, "IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I'M COMING AFTER YOU!"
In a statement issued after Smith's filing on Friday, the Trump campaign said the post was aimed at political interest groups.
"The Truth post cited is the definition of political speech," a Trump spokesperson said in a statement.
The proposed protective order submitted by Smith does not seek to bar Trump from commenting on the case in its entirety, but would restrict Trump and his attorneys from disclosing evidence such as materials returned from grand jury subpoenas and testimony from witnesses and other exhibits shown to the grand jury. It does not limit Trump from discussing materials that were already available to the public separate from the government's investigation.
Smith's attorneys have said the proposed order is largely modeled after similar protective orders issued in other cases.
But in their filing on Monday, Trump's attorneys accuse Smith's team of asking Judge Tanya Chutkan to "assume the role of censor and impose content-based regulations on President Trump's political speech that would forbid him from publicly discussing or disclosing all non-public documents produced by the government, including both purportedly sensitive materials, and non-sensitive, potentially exculpatory documents."
MORE: Judge in Trump's Jan. 6 case gives attorneys 2 weeks to propose trial date
Trump "does not contest the government's claimed interest in restricting some of the documents it must produce" such as grand jury related materials -- but "the need to protect that information does not require a blanket gag order over all documents produced by the government," the filing says.
Judge Chutkan said in an order on Saturday that she would "determine whether to schedule a hearing to discuss the proposed protective order after reviewing Defendant's response."
veryGood! (4)
Related
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- A new Arkansas law allows an anti-abortion monument at the state Capitol
- The U.S. has a high rate of preterm births, and abortion bans could make that worse
- This Week in Clean Economy: U.S. Electric Carmakers Get the Solyndra Treatment
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Changing our clocks is a health hazard. Just ask a sleep doctor
- Exxon Loses Appeal to Keep Auditor Records Secret in Climate Fraud Investigation
- Country Singer Jimmie Allen Apologizes to Estranged Wife Alexis for Affair
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Khloe Kardashian Unveils New Photo of Her Growing Baby Boy
Ranking
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Infection toll for recalled eyedrops climbs to 81, including 4 deaths, CDC says
- Vehicle-to-Grid Charging for Electric Cars Gets Lift from Major U.S. Utility
- Jersey Shore’s Nicole Polizzi Hilariously Reacts to Her Kids Calling Her “Snooki”
- Average rate on 30
- Scientists sequence Beethoven's genome for clues into his painful past
- EPA’s Methane Estimates for Oil and Gas Sector Under Investigation
- Georgia governor signs bill banning most gender-affirming care for trans children
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Is Teresa Giudice Leaving Real Housewives of New Jersey Over Melissa Gorga Drama? She Says...
This Week in Clean Economy: Chu Warns Solyndra Critics of China’s Solar Rise
How Taylor Lautner Grew Out of His Resentment Towards Twilight Fame
Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
On Father's Day Jim Gaffigan ponders the peculiar lives of childless men
Michigan Democrats are getting their way for the first time in nearly 40 years
A months-long landfill fire in Alabama reveals waste regulation gaps